How important were relations with the Soviet Union to China’s economic development by 1960? Explain your answer.
Level
IGCSE
Year Examined
2023
Topic
CHINA, c.1930–c.1990
👑Complete Model Essay
How important were relations with the Soviet Union to China’s economic development by 1960? Explain your answer.
How important were relations with the Soviet Union to China’s economic development by 1960?
Relations with the Soviet Union were initially very important in aiding China’s economic development following the communist victory in the civil war in 1949. However, relations deteriorated rapidly upon Stalin’s death in 1953. It could be argued that Mao’s own domestic economic policies played a more important role in China’s development by 1960.
The close relationship enjoyed by Mao and Stalin in the early 1950s was hugely beneficial to the newly formed People’s Republic of China. The Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, signed in 1950, cemented a military and economic alliance against the West, and the USSR granted $300 million in low-interest loans to help fund the First Five Year Plan. This led to a massive increase in industrial production and the collectivisation of agriculture. These loans helped fund new machinery for peasant cooperatives and later communes. Soviet specialists and experts were sent to help the PRC modernise and industrialise. The USSR provided technical aid for 156 industries with 520 million roubles in loans.
However, when Khrushchev replaced Stalin in 1953, he made it clear that he wanted a less close relationship with China. Loans dried up, as did technical aid. The Soviets refused to share nuclear technology, despite earlier promises, and withdrew all their experts from China in 1960. This dramatic downturn in relations suggests that they were less important to China’s economic development than initially perceived.
Indeed, it could be argued that Mao Zedong’s own domestic economic policies were far more significant. Mao's Land Reforms in 1950 saw the development of cooperatives and collective farming and an end to private ownership of land. These reforms increased agricultural production. Landlord estates were confiscated, and peasants benefited from improved farming methods and access to new machinery.
The First Five Year Plan (1953-57) focussed on the modernisation of infrastructure, such as railways, and saw an increase in the size of the urban population. Targets in heavy industries, such as oil, coal, and steel, were exceeded. This suggests that China was already moving towards significant economic progress before the relationship with the USSR soured.
Furthermore, the Great Leap Forward, launched in 1958, saw the development of communes, in which cooperatives joined together to pool peasant labour for agricultural and industrial purposes. While ultimately a failure that led to famine, the Great Leap Forward demonstrated Mao’s desire to modernise China’s economy away from Soviet influence. Backyard furnaces were set up to produce steel, and peasants, freed from agricultural labor, were employed in mining and other industries.
In conclusion, although relations with the Soviet Union initially provided a significant boost to the Chinese economy in the early 1950s, the increasingly strained relationship, coupled with the impact of Mao’s own domestic policies, suggests that they were less significant in the long run. By 1960, China was pursuing its own path towards economic development, albeit one that would prove highly problematic.
Source:
Ben Walsh, CHINA, c.1930–c.1990 (Cambridge University Press: 2019).
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Here is an essay outline addressing the question of the Soviet Union's impact on China's economic development by 1960.
I. Introduction
The Sino-Soviet relationship played a significant, albeit complex and ultimately limited, role in China's economic development by 1960. This essay will argue that while early Soviet assistance was instrumental in laying the groundwork for industrialization, its withdrawal and the subsequent successes of Maoist policies demonstrate the ultimately greater importance of internal factors.
II. Early Soviet Assistance and its Impact (1950-mid-1950s)
A. The Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship (1950) and its provisions.
1. $300 million in low-interest loans.
2. Transfer of military equipment and technology.
3. Dispatch of Soviet specialists and technical advisors.
B. Impact on China's First Five-Year Plan (1953-1957).
1. Funding for heavy industries like steel, coal, and oil.
2. Assistance in establishing new industrial plants and infrastructure.
3. Contribution to the collectivization of agriculture and formation of cooperatives.
C. Significance of early Soviet aid in jumpstarting China's industrial base.
III. Deteriorating Relations and Declining Soviet Influence (Mid-1950s Onwards)
A. The Sino-Soviet Split and its causes.
1. Ideological differences between Mao Zedong and Nikita Khrushchev.
2. Withdrawal of Soviet aid and technical experts.
B. China's shift towards self-reliance and the development of indigenous industries.
IV. The Role of Internal Factors in China's Economic Development
A. Land reforms and collectivization of agriculture (1950s).
1. Redistribution of land and creation of agricultural cooperatives.
2. Increased agricultural production and surplus for industrial investment.
B. The First Five-Year Plan and its achievements.
1. Focus on heavy industry and infrastructure development.
2. Exceeding production targets in key sectors.
C. The Great Leap Forward (1958-1962) and its mixed results.
1. Formation of communes and mobilization of peasant labor.
2. Ambitious but often unrealistic production goals.
3. Despite its shortcomings, the Great Leap Forward demonstrated China's capacity for independent economic development.
V. Conclusion
While early Soviet assistance provided a crucial initial boost to China's industrialization efforts, its impact should not be overstated. The Sino-Soviet split and the subsequent successes of (albeit flawed) domestic policies like the Great Leap Forward highlight the ultimately greater significance of internal factors in shaping China's economic trajectory by 1960. The Chinese experience underscores the complex interplay of external assistance and domestic initiatives in driving economic development.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
How important were relations with the Soviet Union to China’s economic development by 1960? Explain your answer.
Yes – Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship signed in 1950; military and economic alliance against the West; $300 million of low-interest loans to help fund the First Five-Year Plan; led to massive increase in industrial production and collectivisation of agriculture; helped fund new machinery for peasant cooperatives and later communes; Soviet specialists and experts sent over to help PRC modernise and industrialise; technical aid for 156 industries with 520 million roubles in loans etc.
No – Relations soured when Khrushchev replaced Stalin and loans dried up, as did technical aid; More important: Mao's Land Reforms in 1950 developed cooperatives and collective farming; ended private ownership of land; increased agricultural production; confiscated landlord estates and saw improved farming methods and access to new machinery; First Five Year Plan – modernisation of infrastructure such as railways and increased size of urban population; targets in oil, coal and steel exceeded; Great Leap Forward saw development of communes; cooperatives joined together to pool peasant labour for agricultural and industrial purposes; backyard furnaces produced steel; peasants employed in mining etc.